When talking about diversity in a society, people often use two terms: multiculturalism and melting pot. These two terms are often used interchangeably, but their meanings are different. The key difference between multiculturalism and melting pot is the perspective of whether different cultural groups should be allowed to flourish in a society or if the society should have a culture.

Let us first consider the meaning of crucible. In this concept, the different cultures mix to form a single culture that is mainly based on the dominant culture present in the society. This is not a concept that is viewed very favorably by critics, as they believe that this concept does not tolerate different cultures and places too much emphasis on maintaining the dominant culture. On the other hand, proponents of this concept feel that by allowing different cultures to flourish, it will foster separation and division in society.

However, this last vision of the melting pot is not accepted by all. Some feel that a society should have many cultures. This is what is known as multiculturalism. Some historians and social scientists see multiculturalism as something positive for society. However, it can be said that both melting pot and multiculturalism are not perfect models of diversity, and the effect that a model has on a society depends on the legislation or the lack of legislation in a country.

Some western countries like the United States initially had the attitude when it came to diversity in society. However, they began to change their attitude towards multiculturalism sometime in the 1980s. The main reason for this was the prevailing tension between the dominant culture and other cultures.